Hyatt & AAET v. USPTO, Case: 17-1722 (Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit)

November 8. 2018. The court invites a response from the USPTO to the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. [Order]
November 7, 2018.  Plaintiffs–Appellants Hyatt and AAET’s Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. [Petition]
September 24, 2018. CAFC panel decision denying Plaintiffs–Appellants Hyatt and AAET challenge on the merits.  [Decision]
Supplemental authorities: Plaintiffs–Appellants’ submissions [February 20, 2018, March 6, 2018]; USPTO Reply [February 26, 2018].
June 12, 2017. USPTO Brief on appeal. [Brief]
May 1, 2017. Plaintiffs–Appellants Hyatt and AAET Opening Brief. [Brief]

Case below: Hyatt & AAET v. USPTO, Case No. 2:16-cv-01490 (D. Nev.)

February 17, 2017. Court Order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Order]
February 3, 2017. USPTO’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement. [Reply].
January 12, 2017.  Plaintiffs’ Combined Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to UPTO’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [Reply and Opposition].
December 9, 2016. USPTO’s Combined Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. [Motion & Opposition].
November 9, 2016.  Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement and memorandum in support. [Motion and Memorandum].
June 22, 2016.  Hyatt and AAET file a complaint against the USPTO, asking the Court to find MPEP § 1207.04, as well as
the UPTO’s denial of Mr. Hyatt’s petition under 5 U.S.C. § 553(e) for repeal of MPEP § 1207.04, arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law within the meaning of the APA. [Complaint, Attachments].